Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Skoda Felicia 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 133 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.6 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
| Seat Cordoba engine produces 4 HP more power than Skoda Felicia, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Skoda Felicia. Despite the higher power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.8 | |
|
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Cordoba consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Seat Cordoba gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Cordoba is 8 cm shorter than the Skoda Felicia, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Felicia, which means Seat Cordoba can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Seat Cordoba has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Seat Cordoba, so Seat Cordoba quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
| |