Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Skoda Fabia 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 15.8 seconds | |
|
Seat Cordoba is more dynamic to drive. Seat Cordoba engine produces 32 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Seat Cordoba 1999 1.6 engine: This is a simple and reliable engine with an impressive lifespan when properly maintained. However, many of its issues stem from air leaks, so checking hoses and the intake manifold is essential. The ignition ... More about Seat Cordoba 1999 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Cordoba is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 426 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1225 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Seat Cordoba can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`615 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Cordoba, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |