Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Toyota Corolla Verso 2004
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Seat Cordoba engine produces 10 HP less power than Toyota Corolla Verso, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Toyota Corolla Verso. Despite less power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Corolla Verso is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Corolla Verso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Cordoba engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza, Seat Toledo | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Cordoba might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Seat Cordoba engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Seat Cordoba 1999 1.6 engine: This is a simple and reliable engine with an impressive lifespan when properly maintained. However, many of its issues stem from air leaks, so checking hoses and the intake manifold is essential. The ignition ... More about Seat Cordoba 1999 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Seat Cordoba is smaller. Seat Cordoba is 20 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla Verso, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 423 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 1.1 metres less than that of the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means Seat Cordoba can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 2`035 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 330 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla Verso, so Toyota Corolla Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Toyota Corolla Verso has
| |