Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Hyundai Lantra 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Lantra is a more dynamic driving. Seat Cordoba engine produces 39 HP less power than Hyundai Lantra, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Hyundai Lantra. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Lantra, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Lantra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Lantra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Cordoba engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza | Used also on Hyundai Coupe | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Cordoba might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Cordoba is 29 cm shorter than the Hyundai Lantra, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.4 metres more than that of the Hyundai Lantra, which means Seat Cordoba can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Seat Cordoba has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Lantra has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Seat Cordoba, so Seat Cordoba quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Hyundai Lantra has
| |