Seat Cordoba 2000 vs Volkswagen Polo 2000

 
Seat Cordoba
2000 - 2003
Volkswagen Polo
2000 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP60 HP
Torque: 126 NM116 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.2 seconds16.3 seconds
Seat Cordoba is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Cordoba engine produces 15 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.56.8
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km6.8 l/100km
By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle660 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway810 km on highway
650 km with real consumption660 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.16 m4.14 m
Width: 1.64 m1.64 m
Height: 1.42 m1.46 m
Seat Cordoba is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Cordoba is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data390 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1250 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 8001`490
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better
Average price (€): 8001200
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv