Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Volkswagen Polo 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.3 seconds | 16.3 seconds | |
| Seat Cordoba and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
| Seat Cordoba is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Cordoba is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`490 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |