Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Suzuki Baleno 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 HP | 96 HP | |
Torque: | 116 NM | 134 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.3 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
Suzuki Baleno is a more dynamic driving. Seat Cordoba engine produces 36 HP less power than Suzuki Baleno, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Suzuki Baleno. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 51 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
810 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
630 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.16 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
Seat Cordoba is smaller. Seat Cordoba is 22 cm shorter than the Suzuki Baleno, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 1.1 metres more than that of the Suzuki Baleno, which means Seat Cordoba can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Suzuki Baleno has
| |