Seat Cordoba 1994 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 167 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is a more dynamic driving. Seat Cordoba engine produces 50 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.9 | |
| Seat Cordoba consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Lancer engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Toledo, Seat Ibiza | Used also on Mitsubishi Carisma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Cordoba is 17 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`045 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |