Seat Cordoba 1994 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 107 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.1 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is a more dynamic driving. Seat Cordoba engine produces 15 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Cordoba is 17 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 930 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |