Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Toyota Celica 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | 1.8 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 156 HP | 143 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 235 NM | 172 - 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 11 seconds | 7.4 - 8.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 7.8 | 7.7 - 8.4 | |
|
Seat Cordoba petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but higher. Seat Cordoba is 18 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Seat Cordoba can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |