Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Citroen Xsara 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Seat Cordoba
1999 - 2003
Citroen Xsara
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: Manual Manual/Automatic
Seat Cordoba is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Citroen Xsara has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Engines: 1.6 - 1.91.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 100 - 156 HP71 - 167 HP
Torque: 145 - 235 NM120 - 250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.9 - 11 seconds8 - 15.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.8 - 7.85.2 - 9.3
Seat Cordoba petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara. On average, Seat Cordoba equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.16 m4.19 m
Width: 1.64 m1.70 m
Height: 1.42 m1.40 m
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher.
Seat Cordoba is 3 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`000~ 1`100
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • manual gearbox only
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • fewer faults
Citroen Xsara has
  • both manual and automatic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv