Seat Cordoba 1996 vs Volkswagen Polo 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 116 HP | 60 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 235 NM | 116 - 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 - 16.9 seconds | 10.9 - 16.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 9.2 | 4.9 - 9.0 | |
|
Seat Cordoba petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Seat Cordoba equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Cordoba and Volkswagen Polo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 762 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Seat Cordoba can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 965 | ~ 1`501 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |