Seat Cordoba 1996 vs Rover 400 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 116 HP | 86 - 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 235 NM | 127 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 - 16.9 seconds | 8.5 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 9.2 | 5.3 - 10.2 | |
|
Seat Cordoba petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Rover 400. On average, Seat Cordoba equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Cordoba is 35 cm shorter than the Rover 400, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.3 metres less than that of the Rover 400. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 965 | ~ 1`684 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
| |