Seat Cordoba 2003 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Seat Cordoba is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 64 - 130 HP | 82 - 135 HP | |
Torque: | 125 - 310 NM | 120 - 176 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 17.9 seconds | 9.7 - 13.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 7.7 | 6.5 - 8.4 | |
Seat Cordoba petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Lancer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
Seat Cordoba is 20 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 430 litres | |
Seat Cordoba has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Cordoba has 55 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer. The Mitsubishi Lancer may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`750 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |