Seat Cordoba 2006 vs Citroen Xsara 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Seat Cordoba
2006 - 2009
Citroen Xsara
2000 - 2003
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.91.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 70 - 105 HP71 - 137 HP
Torque: 112 - 240 NM120 - 250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 - 15.9 seconds8.6 - 15.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.6 - 7.55.2 - 7.7
Seat Cordoba petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara. On average, Seat Cordoba equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.19 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.44 m1.40 m
Seat Cordoba is 9 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Cordoba is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 485 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.1 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 933~ 1`086
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 1400800
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • lower fuel consumption
Citroen Xsara has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv