Seat Cordoba 2006 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 70 - 105 HP | 71 - 137 HP | |
Torque: | 112 - 240 NM | 120 - 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 15.9 seconds | 8.6 - 15.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 7.5 | 5.2 - 7.7 | |
Seat Cordoba petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara. On average, Seat Cordoba equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.19 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.40 m | |
Seat Cordoba is 9 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Cordoba is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.1 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 933 | ~ 1`086 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |