Seat Cordoba 1998 vs Ford Mondeo 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Seat Cordoba
1998 - 1999
Ford Mondeo
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual Manual/Automatic
Seat Cordoba is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Ford Mondeo has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Engines: 1.4 - 1.91.8 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 60 - 110 HP90 - 226 HP
Torque: 116 - 235 NM165 - 360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 - 16.9 seconds7.7 - 13.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.0 - 7.96.0 - 10.7
Seat Cordoba petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mondeo. On average, Seat Cordoba equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m4.80 m
Width: 1.64 m1.81 m
Height: 1.43 m1.44 m
Seat Cordoba is smaller.
Seat Cordoba is 66 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1700 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Seat Cordoba can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 850~ 2`115
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 8001000
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • manual gearbox only
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Ford Mondeo has
  • both manual and automatic
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv