Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Skoda Fabia 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seat Cordoba is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Skoda Fabia has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 110 HP | 64 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 235 NM | 112 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 - 17.6 seconds | 10.1 - 18.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 8.0 | 4.5 - 7.8 | |
|
Seat Cordoba petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. On average, Seat Cordoba equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Cordoba is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 426 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1225 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Seat Cordoba can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 914 | ~ 1`641 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |