Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Skoda Felicia 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.3 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 110 HP | 55 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 235 NM | 99 - 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 - 17.6 seconds | 13 - 17.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 8.0 | 5.8 - 6.9 | |
|
Seat Cordoba petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Felicia. On average, Seat Cordoba equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Cordoba is 8 cm shorter than the Skoda Felicia, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Felicia, which means Seat Cordoba can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 914 | ~ 838 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Skoda Felicia has
| |