Seat Cordoba 1994 vs Seat Ibiza 2002

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Seat Cordoba
1994 - 1996
Seat Ibiza
2002 - 2006
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 - 2.01.2 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 60 - 129 HP64 - 180 HP
Torque: 107 - 166 NM112 - 330 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.1 - 16.5 seconds7.3 - 17 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.9 - 8.54.7 - 7.9
Seat Cordoba petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Ibiza. On average, Seat Cordoba equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.11 m3.95 m
Width: 1.64 m1.70 m
Height: 1.41 m1.44 m
Seat Cordoba is 16 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data265 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1030 litres
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.6 metres less than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Seat Cordoba can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`010~ 1`654
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): no data1400
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Seat Ibiza has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv