Seat Ateca 2020 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2020
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Seat Ateca) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
| Seat Ateca engine produces 50 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 290 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 1.9 l/100km + 19.1 kWh/100km | ||
| Range per fill-up: | no data | 3000 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage from one tank of fuel or charge. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.65 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1383 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 1.1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Seat Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`660 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 25 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |