Seat Ateca 2020 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 208 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Seat Ateca is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ateca engine produces 40 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 112 NM more than Mazda CX-5. Thanks to more power Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 6.7 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ateca consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ateca could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Mazda CX-5 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.64 m | |
| Seat Ateca is 17 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Ateca is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1579 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Seat Ateca has 18 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 41 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Seat Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`100 kg | 2`050 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`494 kg | 1`405 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 606 kg | 645 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |