Seat Ateca 2020 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Seat Ateca) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
| Seat Ateca engine produces 50 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 180 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Despite less power, Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 6.2 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ateca consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ateca could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.65 m | |
| Seat Ateca is 1 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ateca is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1579 litres | 1383 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Seat Ateca uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Ateca (by 196 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Seat Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`100 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 25 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |