Seat Ateca 2020 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Seat Ateca is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ateca engine produces 34 HP more power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Mazda CX-30. Thanks to more power Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.0 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ateca consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ateca could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.56 m | |
| Seat Ateca is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-30, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ateca is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1579 litres | 1406 litres | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ateca has 55 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The Mazda CX-30 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Ateca (by 173 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-30, which means Seat Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`130 | 1`969 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 21 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |