Seat Ateca 2020 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Seat Ateca) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota C-HR) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Seat Ateca is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ateca engine produces 34 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 155 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Thanks to more power Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.9 | |
|
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ateca consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that by driving the Seat Ateca over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Seat Ateca gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Seat Ateca is larger. Seat Ateca is 2 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ateca is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1604 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage capacity. Seat Ateca has 133 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`030 kg | 1`865 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`439 kg | 1`390 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 591 kg | 475 kg | |
| Seat Ateca load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem more than Toyota C-HR. Therefore, Seat Ateca is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 18 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |