Seat Ateca 2020 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Seat Ateca and Mazda CX-5 have the same engine power, but Seat Ateca torque is 40 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.7 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ateca consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ateca could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.71 m | |
| Seat Ateca is 17 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Ateca is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1604 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Seat Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`030 kg | 2`050 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`439 kg | 1`430 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 591 kg | 620 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |