Seat Ateca 2016 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Seat Ateca is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ateca engine produces 20 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Thanks to more power Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
By specification Seat Ateca consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ateca could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
1190 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
870 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.34 m | 4.45 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
Seat Ateca is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Ateca is 11 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 472 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1478 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ateca has 13 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The Renault Kadjar may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`050 | |
Safety: | |||
The Renault Kadjar scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ateca has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 23 400 | 12 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |