Seat Ateca 2016 vs Volkswagen T-Roc 2018
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
Volkswagen T-Roc is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ateca engine produces 40 HP less power than Volkswagen T-Roc, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Volkswagen T-Roc. Due to the lower power, Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.1 | |
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ateca consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means that by driving the Seat Ateca over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
Seat Ateca gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.34 m | 4.23 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.57 m | |
Seat Ateca is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ateca is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 392 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1237 litres | |
Seat Ateca has more luggage capacity. Seat Ateca has 118 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen T-Roc. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 2`060 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | high | |
Volkswagen T-Roc has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ateca has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Volkswagen T-Roc, so Volkswagen T-Roc quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 21 600 | 19 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has
| |