Seat Ateca 2016 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Seat Ateca) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota C-HR) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Seat Ateca is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ateca engine produces 34 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 155 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Thanks to more power Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ateca consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that by driving the Seat Ateca over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ateca consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Ateca gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.56 m | |
| Seat Ateca is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota C-HR, 1 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ateca is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 377 litres | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ateca has 133 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. The Toyota C-HR may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |