Seat Ateca 2016 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Skoda Karoq is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ateca engine produces 40 HP less power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Skoda Karoq. Due to the lower power, Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ateca consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that by driving the Seat Ateca over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ateca consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Ateca is 4 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 521 litres | |
| Seat Ateca has 11 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Seat Ateca is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 000 | 24 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |