Seat Ateca 2016 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Seat Ateca) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi ASX) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Seat Ateca is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ateca and Mitsubishi ASX have the same engine power, but Seat Ateca torque is 145 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ateca consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Seat Ateca over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ateca consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Ateca is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 4 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ateca is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1206 litres | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ateca has 104 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The Mitsubishi ASX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ateca has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |