Seat Ateca 2016 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2016
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
Seat Ateca and Mitsubishi ASX have the same engine power, but Seat Ateca torque is 20 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ateca consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Seat Ateca over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ateca consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
760 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.34 m | 4.36 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.63 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Ateca is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Ateca is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 419 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
Seat Ateca has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ateca has 91 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The Mitsubishi ASX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 2`060 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | high | |
Seat Ateca has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Seat Ateca, so Seat Ateca quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 21 600 | 11 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |