Seat Ateca 2016 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Seat Ateca engine produces 25 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Despite less power, Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ateca consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Seat Ateca over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ateca consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Ateca gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2015: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Seat Ateca is smaller. Seat Ateca is 22 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ateca is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ateca has 7 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Seat Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Seat Ateca has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Seat Ateca, so Seat Ateca quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |