Seat Ateca 2016 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Seat Ateca and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque have the same engine power, but Seat Ateca torque is 60 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ateca consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Seat Ateca over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ateca consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Seat Ateca is smaller. Seat Ateca is 2 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 550 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Seat Ateca has 40 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Seat Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`970 kg | 2`350 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`366 kg | 1`715 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 604 kg | 635 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |