Seat Ateca 2016 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 240 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 500 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ateca engine produces 90 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 6.2 | |
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ateca consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Seat Ateca over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.34 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.65 m | |
Seat Ateca is smaller. Seat Ateca is 3 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ateca is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 591 litres | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Seat Ateca has 81 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Seat Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 1`880 | |
Safety: | |||
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 21 600 | 34 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |