Seat Ateca 2016 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Seat Ateca and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque have the same engine power, but Seat Ateca torque is 40 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ateca consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Seat Ateca over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ateca consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Seat Ateca is smaller. Seat Ateca is 3 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ateca is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 575 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Seat Ateca has 65 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Seat Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |