Seat Ateca 2016 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Seat Ateca and Mazda CX-5 have the same engine power, but Seat Ateca torque is 40 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.2 | |
|
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ateca consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Seat Ateca over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2015: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Seat Ateca is smaller. Seat Ateca is 22 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ateca is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ateca has 7 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Seat Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Seat Ateca has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Seat Ateca, so Seat Ateca quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 23 000 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |