Seat Ateca 2016 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Seat Ateca and Mazda CX-5 have the same engine power, but Seat Ateca torque is 40 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ateca consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Seat Ateca over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ateca consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2015: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Seat Ateca is smaller. Seat Ateca is 22 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ateca is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Seat Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`950 kg | 2`110 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`342 kg | 1`480 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 608 kg | 630 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Seat Ateca has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Seat Ateca, so Seat Ateca quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |