Seat Ateca 2016 vs Audi Q3 2011

 
Seat Ateca
2016 - 2019
Audi Q3
2011 - 2014
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP140 HP
Torque: 340 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.3 seconds9.9 seconds
Seat Ateca is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Ateca engine produces 10 HP more power than Audi Q3, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Audi Q3. Thanks to more power Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.35.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.3 l/100km6.4 l/100km
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Ateca consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that by driving the Seat Ateca over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ateca consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1160 km in combined cycle1230 km in combined cycle
790 km with real consumption1000 km with real consumption
Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.34 m4.38 m
Width: 1.81 m1.83 m
Height: 1.60 m1.61 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Ateca is 5 cm shorter than the Audi Q3, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 510 litres460 litres
Seat Ateca has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The Audi Q3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 1 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Seat Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`950 kg2`030 kg
Net weight:1`342 kg1`520 kg
Load capacity:608 kg510 kg
Seat Ateca load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Audi Q3. Therefore, Seat Ateca is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety:
The Audi Q3 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:Seat Ateca has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Audi Q3 has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Seat Ateca, so Seat Ateca quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 14 60011 000
Pros and Cons: Seat Ateca has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • fewer faults
Audi Q3 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv