Seat Ateca 2016 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2016

 
Seat Ateca
2016 -
Mitsubishi ASX
2016 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 115 HP114 HP
Torque: 250 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds11.5 seconds
Seat Ateca is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Ateca engine produces 1 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, but torque is 20 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.35.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km6.1 l/100km
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Ateca consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Seat Ateca over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ateca consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1160 km in combined cycle1200 km in combined cycle
1210 km on highway1270 km on highway
830 km with real consumption980 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.34 m4.36 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.60 m1.63 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Ateca is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Ateca is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 510 litres419 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1219 litres
Seat Ateca has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ateca has 91 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The Mitsubishi ASX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9101`980
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Seat Ateca has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Seat Ateca, so Seat Ateca quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 19 20011 200
Pros and Cons: Seat Ateca has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Mitsubishi ASX has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv