Seat Ateca 2016 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ateca engine produces 35 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, but torque is 40 NM more than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 6.2 | |
|
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ateca consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Seat Ateca over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Seat Ateca gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Seat Ateca is smaller. Seat Ateca is 22 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ateca is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ateca has 7 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Seat Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 1`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Seat Ateca has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Seat Ateca, so Seat Ateca quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |