Seat Ateca 2016 vs Audi Q3 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ateca engine produces 25 HP less power than Audi Q3, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Audi Q3. Due to the lower power, Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ateca consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that by driving the Seat Ateca over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ateca consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1230 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Ateca is 5 cm shorter than the Audi Q3, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 460 litres | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ateca has 50 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q3. The Audi Q3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 1 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Seat Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Audi Q3 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | Seat Ateca has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi Q3 has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Seat Ateca, so Seat Ateca quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |