Seat Ateca 2016 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 185 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
Seat Ateca is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ateca engine produces 34 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Thanks to more power Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.9 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
660 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 280'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Ateca engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Seat Leon | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Ateca might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.34 m | 4.36 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.56 m | |
Seat Ateca is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota C-HR, 1 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ateca is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 377 litres | |
Seat Ateca has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ateca has 133 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. The Toyota C-HR may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota C-HR. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 1`865 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 21 600 | 21 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |