Seat Ateca 2016 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Seat Ateca is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ateca engine produces 33 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 96 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
| 660 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Seat Leon | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Seat Ateca engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Ateca is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Ateca is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1206 litres | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ateca has 126 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The Mitsubishi ASX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ateca has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |