Seat Ateca 2016 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Seat Ateca is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ateca and Mazda CX-30 have the same engine power, but Seat Ateca torque is 37 NM more than Mazda CX-30. Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Ateca is 6 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-30, 1 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ateca is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1406 litres | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ateca has 80 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The Mazda CX-30 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-30. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 1`957 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 400 | 21 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
| |