Seat Ateca 2016 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Seat Ateca) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Seat Ateca and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque have the same engine power, but Seat Ateca torque is 130 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 65 litres | |
| 660 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Seat Leon | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Seat Ateca is smaller. Seat Ateca is 3 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ateca is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 591 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Seat Ateca has 81 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Seat Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`490 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 34 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |