Seat Ateca 2016 vs Audi Q3 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Seat Ateca and Audi Q3 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 64 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Ateca is 5 cm shorter than the Audi Q3, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 460 litres | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ateca has 50 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q3. The Audi Q3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 1 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Seat Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`005 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Audi Q3 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | Seat Ateca has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi Q3 has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Seat Ateca, so Seat Ateca quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |