Seat Ateca 2016 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Seat Ateca is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ateca engine produces 34 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Thanks to more power Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Seat Ateca consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that by driving the Seat Ateca over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Ateca consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Ateca engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Seat Leon | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Ateca might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.56 m | |
| Seat Ateca is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota C-HR, 1 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ateca is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 377 litres | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ateca has 133 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. The Toyota C-HR may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`890 | 1`845 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |