Seat Ateca 2016 vs Toyota C-HR 2016

Seat Ateca
2016 -
Toyota C-HR
2016 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.2 Petrol


Power: 115 HP116 HP
Torque: 200 NM185 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds10.9 seconds
Seat Ateca engine produces 1 HP less power than Toyota C-HR, but torque is 15 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Due to the lower power, Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.25.9
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km7.0 l/100km
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Ateca consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that by driving the Seat Ateca over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ateca consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 960 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
1080 km on highway980 km on highway
720 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption
Seat Ateca gets more mileage on one fuel tank.


Length: 4.34 m4.36 m
Width: 1.81 m1.80 m
Height: 1.60 m1.56 m
Seat Ateca is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota C-HR, 1 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ateca is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 510 litres377 litres
Seat Ateca has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ateca has 133 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. The Toyota C-HR may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota C-HR.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8301`845
Safety: no data
above average
no data
Average price (€): 21 40019 600
Pros and Cons: Seat Ateca has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Toyota C-HR has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: