Seat Ateca 2016 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Kadjar is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ateca engine produces 15 HP less power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Renault Kadjar. Due to the lower power, Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ateca consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that by driving the Seat Ateca over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ateca consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Seat Ateca is smaller. Seat Ateca is 11 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1478 litres | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ateca has 38 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The Renault Kadjar may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`853 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Renault Kadjar scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ateca has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 23 000 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |