Seat Ateca 2020 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 190 HP | 150 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 340 NM | 208 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 - 10.9 seconds | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 8.5 | 4.6 - 7.3 | |
|
Seat Ateca petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5. On average, Seat Ateca equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.68 m | |
| Seat Ateca is 17 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Ateca is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1604 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Seat Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`000 kg | ~ 2`059 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`398 kg | ~ 1`435 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 602 kg | ~ 624 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |