Seat Ateca 2020 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seat Ateca is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Seat Ateca is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Seat Ateca also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 190 HP | 150 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 340 NM | 340 - 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 - 10.9 seconds | 6.6 - 11.2 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Seat Ateca. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 8.5 | 5.6 - 8.1 | |
|
Seat Ateca petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. On average, a Seat Ateca with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.65 m | |
| Seat Ateca is 1 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ateca is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1604 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Ateca has 81 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Seat Ateca uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Seat Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`000 | ~ 2`362 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 31 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |